Skip to main content

Let's Get Off The Clock: Arbitrary Weekly Work Hour Requirements

An interesting article from Inc Magazine made the rounds on the Internet over the past few days with its showcasing of a "less than 40 hour week" startup perk. While at first glance the notion of a work week capped at some amount less than or equal to 40 hours sounds promising for employee retention, long - term morale and even worker productivity, it nevertheless highlights a problematic approach to thinking about work.

Specifically, by framing work weeks in terms of the amount of hours employees are expected to commit, employers are suggesting that the number of hours worked is the most apt measure of productivity. Unfortunately for those supporting 40 hour work weeks, this is the same logic that they problematize in their critique of "80 hours a week" thinking.

For clarity, here's an example. Manager 1 tells his team that they should be working at least 50 hours a week, otherwise they must not be doing a good job at work. Manager 1's logic is that the number of hours his team spends a week is a leading indicator of his team's productivity. Unfortunately for Manager 1, more hours do not necessarily translate to more productivity.

Enter Manager 2, someone who is disgruntled with the demands of the 50 hours a week manager. Manager 2 tells his associates that they must not work more than 40 hours a week, otherwise it is bad for productivity. Manager 2's logic is that if employees are working longer hours, they are not going to produce high quality output. But unfortunately for Manager 2, less hours also do not necessarily translate to increased productivity.

Hours in general do not proxy for productivity. For some people, less hours may yield higher productivity, while for others more hours may yield that same productivity. By setting ceilings and floors on the numbers of hours employees are allowed / expected to work per week, we are inefficiently distributing hours (and therefore productivity).

Alternatively, I think work should be gauged based on measurable outcomes, that is, whether employees meet their key milestones with a high degree of quality. Managers should not care whether their team worked 8 hours or 80 hours, as long as the team has accomplished what it set out to do.

There may be some weeks where a team has to put in 80 hours a week and others where they have to put in 20 hours a week. The key is to let the team's milestones, not some arbitrary work hour requirement, drive the weekly work schedule.

Would love to hear your thoughts on this as well.

You can also follow me on Twitter @thezainpasha


  1. Zain - Great summary. Hourly requirements in any direction are kind of silly, and mostly exist as relics of the industrial revolution. I think startup teams can also use this logic to see why concepts such as "core business hours" are outdated as well. If a team is most productive between noon & 8pm, managers would be silly try to force them to work a different set of hours (like 9-5).


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Carpe Technology: Why students should take advantage of the opportunities available to them today

I recently gave a keynote address at an event focused on inspiring middle school and high school students to pursue careers in technology.

In my talk, I focused on three things: 1) Getting the students excited about the number of technology — driven opportunities available to them today, 2) Encouraging them to vigorously pursue these opportunities and 3) Providing them with tangible examples and strategies to succeed in their pursuit.

I’m going to share some of these thoughts in this post.

The Opportunity Space There are two incontrovertible truths about technology: 1) It always progresses and 2) Today’s students generally have more access to technology than any generation before them.

As a result, the barrier to innovation is probably the lowest it has ever been and with sufficient will, most people can likely see their ideas and innovations through to fruition (although scale of success certainly varies)

What does fulfillment mean to you? Here's my take on the subject.

I think about fulfillment a lot lately, specifically about what it takes for me to feel fulfilled, and how I can maintain that feeling through the ebbs and flows of my personal and professional life. 
I don’t have all the answers but my main purpose in writing this piece is to reassure you that you are not alone in the challenges you may face with personal and professional fulfillment. 
We all go through these challenges and the trick is to understand what maximizes your fulfillment levels and continue doing those things as long as you can. How I think about fulfillment. I tend to think about fulfillment in binary terms, which is to say that I am either fulfilled or I am not — there isn’t much of a middle ground for me on this. This may not be true for others but feeling fulfilled is nevertheless very important to my quality of life.
A higher level of fulfillment also has a lot of tangential benefits including improved health (i.e., I get sick less often), happier personal relationsh…

Mindfulness: 5 Proven Tactics to "De-stress"

Cold and flu season are in full swing, application deadlines are looming, and major life changes are on the horizon; in other words, stress is in the air and odds are you are suffering from it. Here are 5 tactics I use to deal with my stress, hopefully some of them will be useful to you.

1. Be Disciplined - This one may seem counter-intuitive at first, as we often hear about "letting loose" as a way of combating stress. I agree and therefore advocate being disciplined about when and how you "let loose." For some, letting loose may mean developing a craft while for others it may be having a nice meal with some friends. Whatever your "letting loose" lever, make sure you regularly set aside time to use it. Personally, I like watching movies, reading a book with a nice cup of black tea or meeting up with good friends. I make it point to do at least one of these things every weekend, most often on Saturdays.